MORPHOLOGICAL VARIATION IN THE SINALOAN MOUSE Peromyscus simulus

Contenido principal del artículo

David J. Schmidly
Robert D. Bradley

Resumen

ABSTRACT. We examined geographic and non-geographic variation in 23 quantitative characters of the cranium and body for samples of Peromyscus simulus from throughout the range of the species in Sinaloa and Nayarit, Mexico. Univariate statistical analyses indicated little non-geographic variation associated with either sex or age. Geographic variation was evident among samples, with northern, inland representatives averaging smaller in size and showing some degree of distinction from southern, coastal samples. However, the degree of this differentiation is not sufficient to warrant the delineation of subspecies. Available evidence suggest P. simulus has a relative narrow preference for wetland and riparian habitats within its geographic range. These habitats are subject to increased development in this region of Mexico, and, for this reason, the conservation status of the species should be carefully monitored in the future.

 RESUMEN. Examinamos la variación geográfica y no geográfica de 23 caracteres cuantitativos del cuerpo y cráneo de muestras de Peromyscus simulus a lo largo de la distribución de la especie en los estados de Nayarit y Sonora, México. Análisis estadísticos univariados mostraron poca variación no geográfica asociada con el sexo o la edad. Fue evidente la variación geográfica en muestras de representantes de islas al norte, siendo estas de menor tamaño en promedio y mostrando una ligera diferencia con respecto a las muestras costeras y más sureñas. Sin embargo, el grado de esta diferenciación no es suficiente para garantizar el límite de una subespecie. La evidencia disponible, sugiere que P. simulus tiene, relativamente, una preferencia por hábitats riparios y humedales dentro de su rango geográfico. El desarrollo de estos hábitats se ha incrementado en las últimas décadas; por esta razón, en el futuro el estado de conservación de la especie debe ser monitoreado cuidadosamente.

Key words: Peromyscus simulus, morphological variation, Sinaloan mouse, Sinaloa, Nayarit, México.

Detalles del artículo

Compartir en:

Métricas de PLUMX

Citas

Baker, R.H. and J.K. Greer. 1962. Mammals of the Mexican state of Durango.Publications of the Michigan State University Museum, Biological Series, 2: 25-154.

Bradley, R. D. and D. J. Schmidly. 1987. The glan penes and bacula in Latin American taxa of the Peromyscus boylii species group. Journal of Mammalogy, 68: 595-616.

Bradley, R.D., D.J. Schmidly and R.D. Owen. 1989. Variation in the glans penes and bacula among Latin American Populations of the Peromyscus boylii species complex. Journal of Mammalogy, 70: 712-725.

Bradley, R.D., D.J. Schmidly and R.D. Owen. 1990. Variation in the glan penes and bacula among Latin American Populations of Peromyscus aztecus. Occasional Papers, The Museum, Texas Tech University, 165: 1-15.

Carleton, M.D. 1977. lnterrelations of populations of the Peromyscus boylii species group (Rodentia: Muridae) in eastern Mexico. Occasional Papers, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, 675: 1-47.

Carleton, M.D. 1979. Taxonomic status and relationships of Peromyscus boylii from El Salvador. Journal of Mammalogy, 60: 280-296.

Carleton, M.D. 1989. Systematics and evolution. Pp. 7.141 , in: Advances in the study of Peromyscus (Rodentia) (G.L. Kirland, Jr., and J.N. Layne, eds.). Texas Tech University Press, Lubbock, Texas, 366 pp.

Carleton, M.D., D.E. Wilson, A.L. Gardner, and M.A. Bogan. 1982. Distribution and systcmatics of Peromyscus (Mammalia: Rodentia) from Nayarit, Mexico. Smithsonian Contribution to Zoology, 352: 1-46.

Hooper, E.T. 1955. Notes on mammals of western Mexico. Occasional Papers, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, 565: 1-26.

Hooper, E.T. 1958. The male phallus in mice of the genus Peromyscus. Miscellaneous Publications, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, 105: 1-24.

Osgood, W.H. 1904. Thirty new mice of the genus Peromyscus from Mexico and Guatemala. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington. 19: 55-77.

Osgood, W. 1-1. 1909. Revision of the mice of the American genus Peromyscus. North American Fauna, 28: 1-285.

Rohlf. F.L and J. Kishpaugh. 1972. Numerical taxonomy system of multivariate statistical programs. State Univ. New York. Stony Brook, N. Y.

SAS lnstitute, lnc. 1985. User's guide: basics. Version 5 ed. SAS lnstitute, lnc., Cary. North Carolina, 1290 pp.

Schmidly, D.J. 1973. Geographic variation and taxonomy of Peromyscus boylii from Mexico and the southern United States. Journal of Mammalogy, 54: 111-130.

Schmidly, D. J., and G. L. Schroeter. 1974. Karyotypic variation in Peromyscus boylii (Rodentia: Cricetidae) from Mexico and corresponding taxonomic implications. Systematic Zoology, 23: 333-342.

Schmidly, D.J., M.R. Lee, W.S. Modi and E.G. Zimmermann. 1985. Systematics and notes on the biology of Peromyscus hooperi. Occasional Papers, The Museum. Texas Tech University., 97: 1-40.

Schmidly, D.J., R.A. Bradley, and P.S. Cato. 1988. Morphometric differentiation and taxonomy of three chromosomally characterized groups of Peromyscus boylii from east central Mexico. Journal of Mammalogy, 69: 460-480.

Smith, S.A., I.F. Greenbaum, D.J. Schmidly, K.M. Davis and T.W. Houseal. 1989. Additional notes on karyotypic variation in the Peromyscus boylii group. Journal of Mammalogy, 70: 603-608.

Yates, T.L., W.R. Barber and D.M. Armstrong. 1987. Survey of North American collections of recent mammals. Journal of Mammalogy, (suppl.) , 68: 1-76.