Individual identification of tepezcuincle (Cuniculus paca) through the use of footprints

Main Article Content

Rusby Guadalupe Contreras–Díaz
Antonio Santos–Moreno
Ana María Alfaro
Martín Pérez–Lustre

Abstract

The present study had as an objective to design a method to identify individual pacas (Cuniculus paca) using their track characteristics and to apply it in the field. Plaster casts were obtained from the tracks of captive individual pacas, and six linear measures and one angle were taken. To determine if secondary sexual dimorphism exists, a Wilcoxon test was applied to each variable.  A Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was applied over a covariance matrix of standardized data.  For the application of the method in the field, plaster casts were obtained in a 1 km transect established at the edge of the Soyolapan river, in San Martín Soyolapan, Santiago Comaltepec, Oaxaca, during two periods of five days each, in December 2006 and January 2007.  We found no differences between male and female tracks, so we concluded that secondary sexual dimorphism in paca tracks does not exist.  By means of PCA it was possible to identify 61 % of the individuals analyzed.  When applying this method an abundance of five individuals was estimated for the San Martín Soyolapan site.

Article Details

Share on:

Métricas de PLUMX

References

Alfaro Espinosa, A.M. 2006. Patrones de diversidad de mamíferos terrestres del Municipio de Santiago Comaltepec, Oaxaca, México. Tesis de Maestría. Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigación para el Desarrollo Integral Regional, unidad Oaxaca. Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Oaxaca.

Andelt, W.F. y P.S. Gipson. 1980. Toe-clipping coyotes for individual identification. Journal of Wildlife Management, 44:293-294.

Aranda, M. 2000. Huellas y otros rastros de los mamíferos grandes y medianos de México. Instituto de Ecología, A.C. Xalapa, México.

Gore, A.P., S.A. Paranjpe, G. Rajgopalan, A.V. Kharshikar, N.V. Joshi, M.G. Watve y M.G. Gogate. 1993. Tigre census: role of quantification. Current Science, 64:711-714.

Grigione, M.M., P. Burman, V.C. Bleich y B.M. Pierce. 1999. Identifying individual mountain lions Felis concolor by their tracks: refinement of an innovative technique. Biological Conservation, 88:25-32.

Henshaw, R.E. 1981. Toe-clipping coyotes for individual identification: a critique. Journal of Wildlife Management, 45:10051007.

Hintze, J. 2004. NCSS and PASS. Number Cruncher Statistical Systems. Kaysville, Utah.

James, F.C. y C.E. Mcculloch. 1990. Multivariate Analysis in ecology and Systematics: Panacea or Pandora’s Box? Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 21:129-166.

Jewell, Z.C., S.K. Alibhai y P.R. Law. 2001. Censusing and monitoring black rhino (Diceros bicornis) using an objective spoor (footprint) identification technique. Journal of Zoology, 254:1-16.

Karanth, K.U. 1995. Estimating tiger (Panthera tigris) populations from camera-trap data using capture-recapture models. Biological Conservation, 71:333-338.

Lewison, R., E.L. Fitzhugh y S.P. Galentine. 2001. Validation of a rigorous track classification technique: identifying individual mountain lions. Biological Conservation, 99:313-321.

Orjuela C., O.J. y G. Jiménez. 2004. Estudio de la abundancia relativa para mamíferos en diferentes tipos de coberturas y carretera, finca Hacienda Cristales, Área Cerritos La Virginia, Municipio de Pereira, Departamento de risaralda Colombia. Universitas Scientiarum, Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, 9:87-96.

Ortega-R., J. y H.T. Arita. 2005. Cuniculus paca (Linnaeus, 1776). Tepezcuintle. Pp. 815-816, en: Los mamíferos silvestres de México. (Ceballos, G. y G. Oliva, coords.) 1ª edición. Fondo de Cultura Económica, Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO). México, D.F.

Parroquín J, Gallina S. y G. Aguirre. 2002. Densidad del tepezcuintle Agouti paca en el Ejido Loma de Oro Municipio de Uxpanapa, Ver. Conferencia del VI Congreso Nacional de Mastozoología; 21 al 25 de octubre. Oaxaca, México. Asociación Mexicana de Mastozoología.

Pérez, E.M. 1992. Agouti paca. Mammalian Species, 404:1-7.

Piekielek, W. y T.S. Burton. 1975. A black bear population study in northern California. California Fish and Game, 61:4-25.

Reid, F.A. 1997. A field guide to the mammals of Central America and southeast Mexico. Oxford University Press. New York.

Rohfl, F.J. 2005. tpsDig, digitize landmarks and outlines. Version 2.04. Department of Ecology and Evolution, Sate University of New York at Stony Brook.

Simonetti, J.A. y I. Huareco. 1999. Uso de huellas para estimar diversidad y abundancia relativa de los mamíferos de la Reserva de la Biosfera - Estación Biológica del Beni, Bolivia. Mastozoología Neotropical, 6:139-144.

Smallwood, K.S. y E.L. Fitzhugh. 1995. A track count for estimating mountain lion Felis concolor californica population trend. Biological Conservation, 71:251-259.

Stander, P.E. 1998. Spoor counts as indices of large carnivore populations: the relationship between spoor frequency, sampling effort and true density. Journal of Applied Ecology, 35:378-385.

StatSoft. 1996. Statistica. Version 5.1. StatSoft, Inc. San Francisco.

Villa, B. y F.A. Cervantes. 2003. Los mamíferos de México. Grupo Editorial Iberoamérica. México, D.F.

Wemmer, C., T.H. Kunz, G. Lundie-Jenkins y W.J. Mcshea. 1996. Mammalian sign. Pp. 157 176, en: Measuring and monitoring Biological Diversity (Wilson, D.E., F.R. Cole, J.D. Nichols, R. Rudran y M.S. Foster, eds.). Standard methods for mammals. Smithsonian Institution Press. Washington, D.C.

Winegarner, M. 1985. Pugmarks and the biology of the bobcat, Lynx rufus. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde, 50:166-174.

Zavala Hurtado, J.A. 1986. Introducción al enfoque multivariado en estudios de vegetación. Cuadernos de divulgación INIREB no. 26. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones sobre Recursos Bióticos, Xalapa, Veracruz.